Does a leader need followers?

What makes someone a leader? Is the leader simply the person in charge? Is there no required skill set? Perhaps not – if the last few years have shown us anything – global politics, the former Twitter – it’s that holding the top job does not a leader make.

There’s more to leadership than holding power though the two are often conflated.

Daily writing prompt
Do you see yourself as a leader?

We confuse leadership the job with leadership the skill, not unlike the way we conflate wealth with goodness, buckets of evidence to the contrary notwithstanding.

One of the problems I have with leadership is that the best doesn’t seem to be rising to the top. The best are apparently discouraged from joining in the race, and why not. Why participate in a system that seems to embrace ugliness and banality? Why throw your hat in a ring that sees men committing sexual assault elevated?

I don’t stump for leadership, though I often end up assuming it. Sometimes it’s part of my job – managers who don’t lead in some fashion haven’t read the brief. But even when management isn’t my job description, I often end up as a go-to resource by default. It’s odd since I wouldn’t class myself as approachable, and I prefer to not play with others most of the time.

Though I do a good job of building consensus. Now. It’s a skill that’s come with age.

I was reading my kindergarten report care the other day. No, I don’t regularly sit around reliving my glory days. It showed up as I was looking for things to add to the discard pile – I’m culling much of what I’ve been clinging to, though I’ll be keeping this. It’s on really good paper – blue Manila cardstock – and handwritten as they were back in the day. I remember Miss Levers fondly. I adored her in the hero-worship way young children have with their teachers.

The reports said I was doing well with my five-year-old academics – she was surprised by my literacy skills – I’ve always liked to read – but she noted I had a tendency towards bossiness. I don’t think my mother ever shared that bit of information, but it wouldn’t be the last time the charge was levied.

I was outspoken. I was sure I was right in my opinions and positions, and I would dig in. I wasn’t very willing to bend on the big things. Or the small ones, back in the day. It’s a quality that’s come to serve me well. Except for when it doesn’t.

Bossy fixes things.

Bossy gets it done. I hadn’t encountered Tina Fey yet.

Beauty In Total Control, Honey is my favourite BITCH acronym.

I don’t always worry about other people’s feathers in a way that with hindsight, I wish I would have. I can be abrupt. I don’t always explain how I got from “a” to “g.” I’m curious, however, if that “bossy” quality would’ve been labelled such and treated the same – discouraged – if I’d been a boy.

People think we’ve moved beyond sexism, but it’s still everywhere.

Leadership, the quality of organizing and running a group of people, from small collective to international endeavour, is also referred to as “management.” I think perhaps some leaders would be testy if they were described that way, but we are who we are. We’ve given mythical qualities to people who hold positions we imbue with power. the evidence of our eyes notwithstanding. They’re not all that and a slice of cheese. People in leadership are often small, petty, and banal.

I’m not hierarchical, in fact, I’m quite anti: I don’t automatically bestow respect based on title or position. I’m not befuddled by bullshit either: many of those who call themselves leaders are greedy sinecures at best. Leadership isn’t something I seek out very often, even though once upon a time, I thought maybe politics. It’s not the job, it’s the centre of attention thing, which makes politics even more problematic.

Intentions aside, I often end up in a position of de facto leadership. It has nothing to do with whether people choose to follow me or not. I’m not really concerned about the people. It’s the tasks that need to be taken care of. Do that, and the people take care of themselves.

Undone, inefficient, and incompetent bug me. You can’t fix it, however, especially in layered management structures. The easiest solution is the one I usually adopt – take over and get it done. I move things forward, and I’ll do it with the help of other people. I’m bossy, but cooperative with it. Sometimes I think leaders forget they’re simply one of many. Nobody likes to be preached at from the seventh floor.

Unfortunately, when you get things done, you get a reputation for getting things done, and then people start showing up asking for help. Things are easier now that I’m better at saying “no.”

Look at those boundaries, showing up everywhere.

You don’t need followers to be a leader. I don’t even like the language. It feels cultish and hierarchical. I’m more of a, “If you build it they will come” kind of person. Leadership is making sure what needs to happen gets done. It’s not as rarefied a skill set as corporate management with its seven-figure salaries likes to suggest.

I love that someone credited this image with “disembodied voice.”

17 thoughts on “Does a leader need followers?

  1. Yes, I agree some leaders today have totally lost sight of exactly what it means to lead especially in the US political arena. Their leadership is cultish, mean and selfish. Glad to know you kept that progress report, hey some of us were just born with the skill to get ish done 🤣.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. I like it. It puts the responsibility back on leadership. It’s what I was taught as well, but it seems lacking in areas these days. The buck now stops with anyone else.

      Like

  2. The state is a rational invention. Racio is by nature weaker than emotions when it comes to discovering ideas, but it is stronger at defining them when we discover them. Real, true leaders who come from within and are able to move people from within to unity are rare. There are them in every society all the time, but they are rare and rarely come to power because they should have a certain amount of dirt in addition to character. And their moral compass does not allow it. On the other hand, we have people that society produces as leaders. Marketing presents them as leaders; they act like that, and they work like that. We have elections, or they are in power for life without elections, and they act like leaders, but in reality, they are not. They impose rules by force and repression, and they last until they leave power, and then others come who continue the same work. I will remind you all that the president of any country in the world is the only non-professional representative in his workplace, and for that he is paid precisely by our free choice. Instead, I would prefer that the candidates be educated for the office and that we have a choice between two or more educated candidates for president.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. “Marketing presents them as leaders.” Very true. Once upon a time, people who wanted to pursue politics were educated. We’ve moved into a time in society where educated seems to be a pejorative, unless it was undirected studies at the University of YouTube. It’s a shame.

      Thank you for your comment.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Right on.
    It made me think of a situation I was a part of recently. Someone in the position of a mentor wanted me to assign more mentees to them. Sorry, honey, you are a terrible human being and no one wants to have to deal with you, especially when you’re the ‘superior’ in that relationship.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.